Dear Bruce: It is true, Sir Bruce of the Garter. I have
noticed too that when and if I do choose, I'd much more
likely would rather want to choose a top dog, being that
top choice myself. So in which case whichever choice I can
make, it would be a choice to which the outcome would
present not a random choice but a deliberate and analytic
choice of my so choosing the chosen dog of choice. So
whether or not we are to choose the better of the two
choices presented to us, no matter, the choice is obvious.
The cute dog wins. Sounds like double trouble or a triple
header. What if they are triplets? Yet again! Wonders how
one can make up words and get away with it since all the
others words seem so meted and hammer out, well-worn from
scorn and completely inappropriate to what I really want to
say. But the words and their meaning is so determined long
ago by a collective leaning on comprehension. This pivotal
root of understanding how we perceive words and their
meanings is keen when approaching any written assignment
(you may call it homework, which may or may not be work at
home). So then, when we want to choose wisely the words
that seem most beguiling, intriguing and circumspect, we
take upon us the mantle of being completely misunderstood
if we were so to choose a words of inappropriateness. How
irritating these words that render us victims all,
misunderstood words, which have no bearing of how I was
born or my life so far. The individual lost in a sea of
personal enigma, the mass comprehension sinking that
battleship of public opinion. Words that be so imitatingly,
intimidating and limiting when more means less (less IS
more) we have gone too far!jajo
No comments:
Post a Comment