has opened the door to too
many scabs.(joke). Sorry
to say, but in the end, the
lowest bidder may take
precidence over quality. As
a writer this means the
highest quality is a
specialized area. The sweat
of the brow as far as
content is concerned is
individual-specific and not
easily copied. Has anyone
gotten away with copying a
famous writer's style or
skill? No. It would be
advantegous always protect
that artist specific
content because knowledge
is power and power
translates to money.
If you want to be an artist,
and write from an artistic
versus commercial writer
point of view, to coin an
old phrase you have the
open-ended possibility of
making more cash than you
could shake a fist. Remember
always this phrase; unto
thyself be true; Biblical.
Seems people today are
always willing to pay for
top quality content. To have
to have that special
something; means consistency
and specialty. Those many
special skills; i.e.;
writerly craftsmanship,
ideas, concepts, opinions,
knowledge, all translate to
power/money. Yes, there are
ways to get there; study
your favorite writer. Do not
copy that writer, but
embellish the same skills,
and if that writer is rich
and famous, you have a
better chance of meeting the
same good fate. I think it
was Ed Beckley the real
estate magnate, who stated
you must hang around rich
people to get rich
(paraphrasing here. Simple
a concept as this equation;
rich = rich, it is more
often the case than not.
Find those rich contacts and
then, go ahead, wine and
dine them and give them your
business plan. You will find
your own particular "niche"
and run with it. You are
then much more likely to
have people knocking your
door down. It will mean
concentrating and focuses
solely on your own
specialized area of
expertise. Working on this
concept myself and hoping to
get results soon (yah,
right)..."polish that
apple...phhhhtttt(advise
from Andy Warhol)...:)ps
please remember the above
content is for entertainment
purposes only, I haven't a
clue what I am talking
Dear Bruce: The moralistic struggle seems Lazarusian
enough, and I feel there is always that formula. Struggling
as humans do with the good the bad and the ugly. Hatred is
ugly, and you save us at the end (as usual Sir Bruce) with
the old bait and switch and we are back on even footing.
You do so like to balance things, and this is unique and
goodly in this fine work of poetry! Mucho gratis! <
may be a bit too much for this flailing human rapturously
clamouring on the pedagogic scale of justice; tettering
every which way and somewhat loose. Lose those chains that
bind if we can? am I getting there?Jane Jone
Bruce Hamilton's
OUR HATREDS
Our hatreds distill into smirks
constructed from daggers or dirks
eternally aiming
toward absolute maiming
that hurts how the universe works.
That sounds too normal and too formal.
Dear Bruce: Would not the two negatives cancel each other?
"Vast repositories? More likely vast depositories that get
flushed down the old spiral galaxy to be born of LOVE!
Maybe? Wouldn't that be nice? Jane Jones who never hates
only sends out good love vibes!--- In
Bruce Hamilton's
I LIKE YOUR HATRED OF OUR HATREDS
I like your hatred of our hatreds, vast
repositories sure to last and last.
Dear Gayle: Are you talking about
Crit groups? Crit groups can get "highly critical" and
offence, and not very helpful. Struggling writers trying to
have their work critiqued and not the other way around. I
would submit work, only to have a few "chip in" with
negative comments like "I don't read romance, so I can't
help you, sounds good though", or "you're character is too
boring" or "not enough action". Often, at least this what I
have found to be true, to weed out the good advise from the
bad. Are you talking about professional crits Gayle? This
would make a lot more sense. I have tried the online Group
Crits, and personally found them to be more insulting than
helpful. When I made a well-meaning suggestion, they
abruptly "booted me permanently". Very closed minded. If
you have any crit groups out there which has professional
input, I would be most interested. Thank-you for bringing
this to my attention. Yours truly, Jane Jones
>Dear Tom: "Irish is her
first language": does this
mean the Irish lady Editor
is Irish Gaelic? She speaks
the Queen's English, or
American English? She will
not have a clue as to the
unique speech of the
Oklahoman or Texan. How will
you deal with this? She may
say "Oh dear, let me "fix"
the language, and your
Western characters will all
start having a British (or
Irish) accent. How will she
save the dialogue from being
overly "sanitized" by
grammar's strict rules? I
would say to her; "clean up
everything BUT the dialogue.
You wont have much of your
uniqueness left if she dares
touch the dialogue! ps This
is just my opinion, or my
two cents worth! Take it for
that, please! :) Jane Jones
only sends out good love vibes!
about! Jane Jones---
No comments:
Post a Comment